Close Menu
FlyMarshallFlyMarshall
  • Aviation
    • AeroTime
    • Airways Magazine
    • Simple Flying
  • Corporate
    • AINonline
    • Corporate Jet Investor
  • Cargo
    • Air Cargo News
    • Cargo Facts
  • Military
    • The Aviationist
  • Defense
  • OEMs
    • Airbus RSS Directory
  • Regulators
    • EASA
    • USAF RSS Directory
What's Hot

Ukraine’s army chief shakes up troop rotations after outcry

May 3, 2026

From prototypes to production: US Air Force seeks nearly $1B for initial CCA procurement

May 3, 2026

Romania enters US counter-drone marketplace

May 3, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Demo
  • Aviation
    • AeroTime
    • Airways Magazine
    • Simple Flying
  • Corporate
    • AINonline
    • Corporate Jet Investor
  • Cargo
    • Air Cargo News
    • Cargo Facts
  • Military
    • The Aviationist
  • Defense
  • OEMs
    • Airbus RSS Directory
  • Regulators
    • EASA
    • USAF RSS Directory
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Demo
Home » Change Incorporation, Configuration Control, and the High Cost of Getting It Wrong
AINonline

Change Incorporation, Configuration Control, and the High Cost of Getting It Wrong

FlyMarshall NewsroomBy FlyMarshall NewsroomMarch 18, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Editor’s note: Boeing spent years doing rework on the 737 MAX and the 787 after the former’s grounding following two fatal crashes and the latter’s production flaws. “Shadow factories” began the 737’s rework after the 21-month grounding was terminated in November 2020. The last of 450 airplanes was delivered in 2025. Deliveries of the 787 were suspended in October 2020; 110 aircraft needed rework. The last of this inventory was cleared in 2025. This work is also known as “Change Incorporation.” Thirty-five 737 MAX 7s and 10s have been built and await certification, which idepends on design changes that must be retrofitted once the Federal Aviation Administration signs off. Change incorporation took 3-4 months for the 787s and was measured in months for the 737s.

More than 30 777-9s have been built while this program awaits FAA certification. This, too, will require Change Incorporation. Boeing has not revealed what changes the FAA will require, although revised flight control software is known to be one element. Nor has Boeing revealed how long Change Incorporation for the 777-9s will take.

LNA’s news team explains what Change Incorporation is, how it is undertaken, and the implications for the 777-9s in inventory.

Subscription Required

By the Leeham News Team

March 18, 2026, © Leeham News: In the commercial aviation industry, building aircraft before the type certificate is formally issued is not unusual. It is an economic necessity.

Undelivered Boeing 777-9s (among other aircraft) are lined up in open-air storage in this undated 2025 Google Earth photo of Paine Field, Everett (WA). The 777s are the “green” airplanes, though more are also painted in other colors.

Launching a production line months or years before final regulatory approval allows manufacturers to meet early delivery commitments, recoup development investment more quickly, and maintain customer relationships. But this strategy carries a profound and often underestimated technical liability: when the approved design specification continues to evolve through flight test, the already-built airframes must be brought into conformance with the final certified configuration. This is the essence of the Change Incorporation process.

The Boeing 777X program offers the most current illustration of this challenge. As of early 2026, Boeing has assembled more than 30 777-9 airframes, all built to early-production standards, while the aircraft’s type certificate is still in progress.

At the same time, the January 2024 in-flight separation of a door plug from Alaska Airlines Flight 1282—an event traceable directly to failures in Boeing’s parts removal and reinstallation process—has thrown the Change Incorporation process into the spotlight.

These two stories are connected by a single systemic thread: the consequences of inadequate configuration discipline in a complex, multi-stakeholder manufacturing environment.

source

FlyMarshall Newsroom
  • Website

Related Posts

Bjorn’s Corner: Blended Wing Body Airliners. Part 8

May 1, 2026

MTU Aero Engines posts Q1 gains, sees continued strength despite geopolitical pressures

April 30, 2026

The Regulatory Reality Behind the Autonomous ATC Gold Rush

April 30, 2026

Airbus 1Q2026 Results: First quarter “suffering”

April 29, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest Posts

Ukraine’s army chief shakes up troop rotations after outcry

May 3, 2026

From prototypes to production: US Air Force seeks nearly $1B for initial CCA procurement

May 3, 2026

Romania enters US counter-drone marketplace

May 3, 2026

Pacific Marines will be first to test-drive new pilot-optional helicopter

May 3, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
About Us

Welcome to FlyMarshall — where information meets altitude. We believe aviation isn’t just about aircraft and routes; it’s about stories in flight, innovations that propel us forward, and the people who make the skies safer, smarter, and more connected.

 

Useful Links
  • Business / Corporate Aviation
  • Cargo
  • Commercial Aviation
  • Defense News (Air)
  • Military / Defense Aviation
Quick Links
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
Copyright © 2026 Flymarshall.All Right Reserved
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Go to mobile version