Close Menu
FlyMarshallFlyMarshall
  • Aviation
    • AeroTime
    • Airways Magazine
    • Simple Flying
  • Corporate
    • AINonline
    • Corporate Jet Investor
  • Cargo
    • Air Cargo News
    • Cargo Facts
  • Military
    • The Aviationist
  • Defense
  • OEMs
    • Airbus RSS Directory
  • Regulators
    • EASA
    • USAF RSS Directory
What's Hot

Classic Aero-TV: Living the Dream – ANG’s John Klatt Performs at EAA

March 28, 2026

ANN’s Daily Aero-Term (03.25.26): VFR-On-Top

March 28, 2026

ANN’s Daily Aero-Linx (03.25.26)

March 28, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Demo
  • Aviation
    • AeroTime
    • Airways Magazine
    • Simple Flying
  • Corporate
    • AINonline
    • Corporate Jet Investor
  • Cargo
    • Air Cargo News
    • Cargo Facts
  • Military
    • The Aviationist
  • Defense
  • OEMs
    • Airbus RSS Directory
  • Regulators
    • EASA
    • USAF RSS Directory
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Demo
Home » ‘Department of War’ rebrand could cost up to $125 million, CBO says
Defense News (Air)

‘Department of War’ rebrand could cost up to $125 million, CBO says

FlyMarshall NewsroomBy FlyMarshall NewsroomJanuary 15, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Trump administration’s effort to rename the Department of Defense as the Department of War could cost taxpayers anywhere from $10 million to $125 million, according to an analysis released by the Congressional Budget Office on Wednesday.

The 11-page report said a “modest implementation” of the name change would cost about $10 million. But that figure could rise up to $125 million if the new moniker were adopted “broadly and rapidly” across the department.

The congressional office noted the estimate is “uncertain” because the Pentagon “has not provided information” about how it plans to carry out the executive order signed by President Donald Trump in September.

At the time of the announcement, Trump declared the Department of War was a “much more appropriate name, especially in light of where the world is right now.”

Trump went on to argue that the Department of Defense was too politically correct, and the Department of War “just sounded better,” noting it would be a callback to the original name used during the two world wars.

“We won the first world war, we won the second world war, we won everything before that and in between,” Trump stated in the Oval Office in September. “And then we decided to go woke and we changed the name to the Department of Defense.”

The executive order directed the federal government to adopt the Department of War as a secondary title. Since then, the Pentagon has often styled itself that way, though its legal name remains unchanged. A formal renaming would require congressional approval, which has not been granted.

The White House, in a fact sheet, said the Pentagon may use the Department of War name in official correspondence, public communications, ceremonies and non-statutory documents within the executive branch.

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), one of the two lawmakers who requested the report, cast the rebranding effort as “performative government at its worst.”

“Instead of prioritizing bringing down the cost of groceries or health care, Trump and his cronies are focused on vanity projects like renaming the Department of Defense,” Merkley said in a statement. “This move is performative government at its worst and does nothing to advance national security or help service members and their families.”

The Department of War, signed into law by President George Washington in 1789, stood for more than a century and a half as the central military authority in the United States.

After World War II, President Harry S. Truman replaced it with the National Military Establishment, merging the War and Navy departments with the newly independent Air Force. Two years later, it was rechristened the Department of Defense.

In September, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said reverting to the Department of War in the modern era would signal “maximum lethality, not tepid legality; violent effect, not politically correct.”

Tanya Noury is a reporter for Military Times and Defense News, with coverage focusing on the White House and Pentagon.

source

FlyMarshall Newsroom
  • Website

Related Posts

Marines test ‘cruise control’ swim feature on amphibious vehicle prototype

March 22, 2026

Texelis, Scata team up on medium-heavy vehicle that can do drone defense

March 21, 2026

Ukraine deploys units to 5 Middle East countries to intercept drones

March 21, 2026

Two suspected Iranian spies reportedly arrested near UK submarine base

March 21, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest Posts

Classic Aero-TV: Living the Dream – ANG’s John Klatt Performs at EAA

March 28, 2026

ANN’s Daily Aero-Term (03.25.26): VFR-On-Top

March 28, 2026

ANN’s Daily Aero-Linx (03.25.26)

March 28, 2026

NTSB Prelim: Stinson 108-3

March 28, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
About Us

Welcome to FlyMarshall — where information meets altitude. We believe aviation isn’t just about aircraft and routes; it’s about stories in flight, innovations that propel us forward, and the people who make the skies safer, smarter, and more connected.

 

Useful Links
  • Business / Corporate Aviation
  • Cargo
  • Commercial Aviation
  • Defense News (Air)
  • Military / Defense Aviation
Quick Links
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
Copyright © 2026 Flymarshall.All Right Reserved
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Go to mobile version