Close Menu
FlyMarshallFlyMarshall
  • Aviation
    • AeroTime
    • Airways Magazine
    • Simple Flying
  • Corporate
    • AINonline
    • Corporate Jet Investor
  • Cargo
    • Air Cargo News
    • Cargo Facts
  • Military
    • The Aviationist
  • Defense
  • OEMs
    • Airbus RSS Directory
  • Regulators
    • EASA
    • USAF RSS Directory
What's Hot

Safran reports strong Q1 2026, with ‘little to no impact’ from war

April 23, 2026

Lufthansa presents first retrofitted Airbus A380 with business class upgrade

April 23, 2026

CAMP pushes deeper into AI as aviation software tools begin reaching customers

April 23, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Demo
  • Aviation
    • AeroTime
    • Airways Magazine
    • Simple Flying
  • Corporate
    • AINonline
    • Corporate Jet Investor
  • Cargo
    • Air Cargo News
    • Cargo Facts
  • Military
    • The Aviationist
  • Defense
  • OEMs
    • Airbus RSS Directory
  • Regulators
    • EASA
    • USAF RSS Directory
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Demo
Home » How Did 2 Aircraft Come So Close To Crashing Head-On In New Zealand?
Simple Flying

How Did 2 Aircraft Come So Close To Crashing Head-On In New Zealand?

FlyMarshall NewsroomBy FlyMarshall NewsroomDecember 11, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Two aircraft came within seconds of a mid-air collision, the New Zealand Transport Accident Investigation Commission (TAIC) has found. This near-miss involved two aircraft: an Air New Zealand Q-300 and a Beech Duchess, both operated by a local flying school.

The commission noted that the near-miss came down to several failures in the way the airspace in this South Pacific country is managed. The close call occurred in the skies above the Northland city of Whangarei Airport, where the airspace has not been reviewed in more than a decade.

A Close Call

Air New Zealand Q300 Credit: Flickr

The report published by RNZ identifies that on Monday, August 28, 2023, an Air New Zealand Q300 flight departed from Whangarei Airport (WRE) bound for Auckland International Airport (AKL). There were 40 passengers onboard, an 80% occupancy for the 50-seater aircraft. As the aircraft had departed, it was destined for the country’s largest airport, Auckland. At the same time, a flying school aircraft was flying from Ardmore to Whangarei, following a similar flight paths.

The Q-300 had been operating at approximately 6,000 feet when the Beech Duchess descended to the same altitude in front of the commercial airplane. The Air New Zealand crew was alerted to a potential collision through the aircraft’s airbonre collision avoidance system, and the flight was given clearance to climb to 8,000 feet.

The two planes were just 41 seconds apart, or 4.9 miles (eight kilometers) apart at the closest point, traveling at 434 miles (700 kilometers) for their closing speed (how it is calculated how quickly two objects are approaching one another).

An Investigation Was Opened

Air New Zealand Q300 Credit: Flickr

Following the incident, the TAIC launched an investigation into the near-miss, which identified that the controller and flight service officer had not provided sufficient timely traffic information, and subsequently put both flights into uncontrolled airspace. Recurring concern had been raised by previous pilots and the airport operators, but the last review for the region’s airspace had not been undertaken since 2014.

This resulted in both airplanes operating within the clouds, and unable to sight one another, this led to the potential head on collission, and saw the Beech in a vulnerable position where it was left to coordinate its own avoidance. Further investigation noted that there is a long-standing review needed into the design of the Northland sector airspace.

Additionally, the review found that there was no responsible agency that was mandated to administer the ongoing review of national airspaces and identify any existing or emerging risks that could lead to another near-miss event. The Civil Aviation Authority has since been working with airspace stakeholders in Whangarei to work on safety improvements. The CAA is also set to undertake reviews of uncontrolled airspaces across the country, including Timaru, Hokitika, Whakatane, and the Kapiti Coast.

air new zealand airbus a320neo flying


Air New Zealand Airbus A320 Mid-Flight Engine Loss Was Caused By A Damaged Cockpit Switch

Several other shutdown events have been linked to the same component defect.

Air New Zealand Regional Aircraft Fleet

Air New Zealand Q300 A320 Wellington Credit: Flickr

Air New Zealand operates two different turboprop aircraft to service the many towns and cities that require non-stop flights to the country’s three largest cities ( Auckland Airport, Wellington Airport, and Christchurch). These are provided by the 29 ATR 72-600 aircraft, which have an average age of 7.1 years, alongside an additional 23 Q300 aircraft (with a much older average age of 17.2 years). Other aircraft in the wider Air NZ fleet include the Boeing 777-300ER, 787, Airbus A320ceo (domestic operations), and A320 and A321neo.

These airpanes are perfect due to the unique landscape and dispersed population across the country. The turbo-props are fuel-efficient and ideal to operate shorter regional routes, and service smaller airports that can face adverse weather conditions. These flights provide connectivity not only to the country’s three largest cities, but also feed into the airline’s wider domestic jet network and international operations.

The turboprops are the network’s backbone, and operate to all 20 of Air New Zealand domestic destinations, stretching from as far north as the Bay of Islands (KKE), to as far south as Invercargill (IVC) – the most southerly airport operated in the commonwealth. For Air New Zealand, these airplanes offer the right balance for operational cost, versatility, and capacity.


source

FlyMarshall Newsroom
  • Website

Related Posts

How Cabin Crew Rest & Sleep On The Airbus A380

January 1, 2026

Cabin Odor Prompts Delta Air Lines Boeing 737-900ER Diversion To Atlanta

January 1, 2026

The Aircraft Set To Replace One Most Versatile Narrowbody Aircraft In The World

January 1, 2026

Air Vs Airlines Vs Airways: What's The Difference?

January 1, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest Posts

Safran reports strong Q1 2026, with ‘little to no impact’ from war

April 23, 2026

Lufthansa presents first retrofitted Airbus A380 with business class upgrade

April 23, 2026

CAMP pushes deeper into AI as aviation software tools begin reaching customers

April 23, 2026

IFS targets aviation technicians with industrial AI push

April 23, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
About Us

Welcome to FlyMarshall — where information meets altitude. We believe aviation isn’t just about aircraft and routes; it’s about stories in flight, innovations that propel us forward, and the people who make the skies safer, smarter, and more connected.

 

Useful Links
  • Business / Corporate Aviation
  • Cargo
  • Commercial Aviation
  • Defense News (Air)
  • Military / Defense Aviation
Quick Links
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
Copyright © 2026 Flymarshall.All Right Reserved
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Go to mobile version