Subscription Required
By the Leeham News Team
The last in a Series examining one of Boeing’s steps toward recovery.
May 18, 2026, © Leeham News: The Boeing 787 program, launched in 2004 with a promised first flight in 2007 and customer delivery in 2008, was not simply a new airplane. It was a complete reimagining of how a commercial jet could be designed, funded, and manufactured.
Credit: Leeham News.
Boeing’s senior leadership, facing intense financial pressure and seeking to reduce its own capital exposure in a multi-billion-dollar development program, chose to distribute both the manufacturing and financial risks across a global supply chain of risk-sharing partners.
The level of industrial outsourcing on the 787 program led to one of corporate America’s greatest industrial financial and execution disasters. Credit: Seattle Times.
Suppliers would not merely provide components. They would design, build, and deliver complete major assemblies—entire fuselage sections, the wing structure, the empennage. The suppliers would absorb the tooling and development costs themselves in exchange for long-term production revenue.
Related Stories
The economic logic was genuinely compelling. Boeing watched Airbus fund the A380 with European government launch aid while Boeing shouldered its own development costs.
Executives thought that the risk-sharing model promised to drastically reduce Boeing’s capital outlay, spread the financial exposure across dozens of partners with their own balance sheets. Also, in theory, this model would harness the engineering capabilities of world-class suppliers who would bring design innovation along with manufacturing capacity. Suppliers like Mitsubishi, Kawasaki, Fuji, Alenia, and Spirit AeroSystems were not minor subcontractors. They were substantial aerospace manufacturers in their own right.