Boeing 747-400 and the Boeing 757 variants. These aircraft defined commercial aviation in the 1980s and quickly became very popular among airlines all over the world. The Boeing 747 had been around for about 20 years when the -400 variant was introduced, but the 757 was a new product of the 1980s. Both of these aircraft enjoyed prolific careers, and often were members of the same fleet.
Each aircraft is unique in its own way, but there are some similarities. One common area of comparison between the 747-400 and the 757 is the engine. Many conclude that the same engine powers both aircraft. And for the most part, that is correct. However, very slight design differences make that conclusion wrong. To foster an accurate and informed discussion, it is important to recognize the few differences that make each powerplant different. This article profiles each engine and explains the technical context between the two aircraft.
It’s A Valid Question
The reality is that each aircraft has more than one engine option. In both cases, operators had a choice between an American-designed Pratt & Whitney engine and a British-designed Rolls-Royce engine. This is indeed a high-level similarity between the powerplants of both aircraft. But more specifically, the Rollys-Royce engine designed for each aircraft falls under the name RB211. For the purposes of this article, only the RB211 engine will be considered and compared. After all, that is usually the engine people are referring to when they say the 747-400 and 757 have the same engine.
The truth is that while both aircraft have RB211 engines, each one is slightly different. Much like how the 747 and 757 have different variants under the same family name, like the 747-8 and 757-300, the RB211 engine has different variants as well. This is where the distinction between the two is. Same engine family, different engine type.
Both RB211 engine variants were developed in the same era of commercial aviation, and are truly very similar. This is perhaps another cause of some of the confusion. Given the overlapping service histories and shared manufacturer, it is understandable why the question arises. While the comparison is logical, the technical reality shows that the engines used on the 747-400 and the 757 are distinct and purpose-built for their respective aircraft.
747-400 Engine
The 747-400 was developed from the Boeing 747-300, and is part of the most iconic family of aircraft ever made by Boeing. The first service flight took place on February 9, 1989, with Northwest Airlines. Manufacturing of the jumbo jet stopped in the 2000s, and in total, 694 aircraft were built. The 747-400 differed from its predecessors in its wing design, among other design differences. The new wings were longer and lighter than previous variants, and had winglets at the end. This increased cruise and takeoff performance.
The 747-400 is outfitted with four RB211-524 engines (in particular, the G and H variants of the RB211-524). The RB211-524 series was originally designed for the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar in the early 1970s, and is a triple-spool high bypass engine. The engine was successful, and when Boeing introduced the 747-400, Rolls-Royce responded with the -524G and -524H versions of the RB211 engine.
|
747-400 Engine Specs |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Engine |
RB211-524G |
RB211-524H |
|
Dry Weight (pounds) |
12,540 |
12,764 |
|
Max. Thrust (pounds-force) |
56,870 |
59,450 |
|
Overall Pressure Ratio |
32.8:1 |
32.9:1 |
Source: UK Civil Aviation Authority No. 1046, UK Civil Aviation Authority No. 1048
The main upgrade was power, as the new 747-400 was heavier than previous aircraft that used the RB211-524. But the RB211-524G/H were also the first RB211 engines to incorporate full authority digital engine control (FADEC). This was symbolic of the design efforts focused on making the 747-400 more technologically advanced than older models.
The RB211-524 engine series was continuously developed over the years by Rolls-Royce. In 1993, the -524H achieved an ETOPS rating approval of 180 minutes with the 767. Today, a lot of Boeing 767-300ER aircraft still fly with RB211-524 engines. The 747-400 was a clear advancement in the 747 family, and although there are not many passenger variants still flying today, the RB211-524 engine proved to be a significant reason for the aircraft’s popularity in the market.
The Last Boeing 747-400 In America With A Passenger Cabin
Only one Boeing 747-400 in a passenger configuration still flies with Atlas Air.
757 Engine
The 757 is the epitome of a workhorse. There were two passenger variants built by Boeing, the Boeing 757-200 and the Boeing 757-300 (there was a third cargo variant, the 757-200F, that still flies today as well). The first service flight for the 757 took place on January 1, 1983, with Eastern Air Lines. Boeing introduced the stretched 757-300 variant in 1996 at the Farnborough Airshow, and has been admirably dubbed the “Flying Pencil”. The 757 was extremely popular, and when production stopped in 2004, a total of 1,050 aircraft had been built. Pilots laud the 757 for its great climb performance, among other beneficial performance qualities.
The 757 is outfitted with two RB211-535 engines. Rolls-Royce adapted previous RB211 engines in response to Boeing’s efforts to design a twin-engine successor to the 727. Rolls-Royce figured that by decreasing the diameter of previous RB211 engines, they could create a new version fit for the higher capacity 757 by Boeing. The result was the RB211-535 series. The -535C was introduced with the 757 in 1983. Competition with Pratt & Whitney led to the development of the RB211-535E4, which was the engine of choice for
|
757 Engine Specs |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine |
RB211-535E4 |
|
Dry Weight (pounds) |
8,169 |
|
Max. Thrust (pounds-force) |
42,540 |
|
Overall Pressure Ratio |
25:1 |
Source: UK Civil Aviation Authority No. 1049
The reliability of the 757 and its RB211 engines made the aircraft a popular choice among non-airline entities as well. Notably, the United States Air Force operates six 757-200 aircraft under the C-32A name for the transport of VIP personnel, such as the Vice President. These C-32A aircraft, however, are powered by American Pratt & Whitney engines. The US Air Force does operate two C-32B aircraft though, which are powered by Rolls-Royce RB211 engines. These aircraft are used for special airlift support. In short, the 757 is a very reliable aircraft, partly thanks to its engines. It will be a sad day when the 757 makes its last flight carrying passengers.
The Aircraft Set To Replace The Iconic Boeing 757
There isn’t a single airliner that can replicate all of the Boeing 757’s capabilities, but perhaps the market doesn’t require one.
Comparing The Two RB211s
The RB211 engine series was, and still is, overwhelmingly successful. The ability to take a general design and make special adaptations to specific market demands has been a reason why Rolls-Royce engines have flown for so long. The 524 and 535 series were both popular. For a more direct comparison between the RB211-524 engine on the 747-400 and the RB211-535 engine on the 757, see the table below.
|
RB211 Engine Comparison |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Engine |
RB211-524H |
RB211-535E4 |
|
Aircraft |
747-400 |
757-200, 757-300 |
|
Length (inches) |
187.35 |
198.2 |
|
Fan Diameter (inches) |
86.3 |
74.1 |
|
Max. Thrust (pounds-force) |
59,450 |
42,540 |
|
Bypass Ratio |
4.3:1 |
4.4:1 |
Source: UK Civil Aviation Authority No. 1048, UK Civil Aviation Authority No. 1049
Both engines are very similar, in size and performance. This is why many think they are the same, even though there are slight differences. The main difference is in thrust available, and it makes sense that the 747-400 engine is more powerful. The RB211 became the basis for the now popular Trent series of engines when the RB211-524L was renamed the Trent in 1989. The Trent family of engines power many twin-engine wide-body airliners today, such as the Trent 1000 on the Boeing 787.
Fleet Dynamics Of Each Aircraft
As mentioned, both the 747-400 and 757 are retired aircraft by Boeing. This means they are no longer being manufactured. And even though all US airlines have retired the 747, there are still some international airlines that fly the iconic aircraft. But for the most part, the 747-400 is mainly operated for cargo purposes. The 757 is in a similar situation with many airlines retiring the aircraft, but the difference is that US airlines are the ones flying the most 757s today.
|
747-400F Cargo Operators Today |
|
|---|---|
|
Atlas Air |
43 |
|
Kalitta Air |
22 |
|
Cargolux |
16 |
|
UPS Airlines |
13 |
|
Asiana Airlines |
10 |
The 747-400 is very close to being completely gone from commercial services. However,
|
757 Operators Today |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Largest Airline Operators |
Notable Cargo Operators |
||||
|
757-200 |
757-300 |
757-200PC/PCF |
757-200SF |
||
|
Delta Air Lines |
85 |
16 |
FedEx |
82 |
|
|
United Airlines |
40 |
21 |
UPS |
75 |
|
|
Icelandair |
11 |
DHL Air Austria |
18 |
||
Conclusion: Same Family, Different Specs
The answer to the question of this article is: no, the 747-400 is not powered by 757 engines. While it is true that both aircraft operate with RB211 engines, the distinction is in which version of that engine each uses. The 747-400 uses the RB211-524G/H engine, and the 757 uses the RB211-535 engine.
These engines come from the same family but are not interchangeable. They mainly differ in diameter and thrust available. For two aircraft as tried and true as the 747-400 and 757, it makes sense that they both operate on tried and true engines. The RB211 engine family has successfully powered both aircraft for nearly 50 years.


